Home
- - - - - - -
About David Batstone
Saving the Corporate Soul
Consulting Services
Speaking Events
- - - - - - -
WAG
Right Reality Blog
Articles
Press
- - - - - - -
Contact David Batstone
Store
- - - - - - -
RSS


Subscribe to the WAG
Email:
Zip:
 

 


A Baseball Parable Print E-mail
Written by David Batstone   

Controversial baseball slugger Barry Bonds is poised to break the magic 714 mark of career home runs set long ago by the legendary Babe Ruth.

The pursuit of the San Francisco Giants star is tainted by charges that Bonds regularly used performance-enhancing drugs (steroids). When he passes the Babe, Bonds still would lie 40 home runs behind the all-time home run king, Henry Aaron.

On the radio this week in San Francisco, sportscaster John Miller told a fascinating tale about what happened to Hank Aaron’s final home run ball, #755.

Aaron spent the last two years of his career with the Milwaukee Brewers. It was somewhat of a farewell tour, since Aaron played nearly a decade in Milwaukee with the Braves before the team – and Aaron - moved to Atlanta.

Nothing eventful marked Aaron’s final swat at the time. It happened during a game in the middle of the 1976 season, and both the Brewers and their opponents that day, the Angels, sat at the bottom of the league ladder. About 10,000 fans were scattered throughout the stadium. Aaron came up in the 7th inning and jumped on a hanging slider thrown by Angels’ pitcher Dick Drago. The ball sailed over the left field fence.

As the ball rattled around beyond the fence, groundskeeper Richard Arndt jogged over and retrieved it. After the game, the management of the Brewers made an effort to obtain the ball from Arndt. Knowing the season was to be Aaron’s last, the club realized that every homer had the potential to be historic. Arndt told the club that he would forfeit the ball on one condition: He wanted to meet Aaron personally and deliver the ball to him.

Not only did the management refuse his request, they fired Arndt as a groundskeeper, effective immediately. To add insult to injury, the club docked $5 from his final paycheck to cover the cost of the ball. Arndt walked out with his dignity and #755 intact.

Once the season ended without another Aaron home run, the value of Arndt’s ball increased dramatically. Aaron himself tried to make contact with the former groundskeeper to negotiate a financial arrangement, but Arndt decided to keep possession of the ball in a safe deposit box.

Then, after several years passed, Arndt made a bold and savvy move. Well-known retired ballplayers make a significant income attending large sports shows to sign autographs for paying customers. Arndt paid $20 to stand in line – anonymously, of course - to have Aaron sign the historic ball. An unwitting Aaron added his autograph to the ball, and the value of #755 increased yet again.

In 1999, Arndt decided to put the ball up for sale and an undisclosed buyer put up $650,000. Arndt finally received just payment due on his severance from the Milwaukee Brewers. To his credit, Arndt donated 25% of the proceeds of the sale to Chasing the Dream Foundation, a project that Aaron set up for underprivileged children to help them develop their artistic talents.

The story of home run ball #755 has all the character of a parable. Heed the message, managers. Ponder long and hard before firing a talented employee. It may be that the deposed one will walk out the door with a valuable asset. However much you later long to recover it, a treasure once spurned rarely returns back home.


How does the parable of ball #755 speak to you? Share your ideas:

Comments
Add NewSearchRSS
Frank Watson - Departing employees
2006-05-09 22:14:14
Departing employees always walk out the door with valuable assets, when you consider that "time in service" brings experience, training, and omnidirectional connectedness.

Some employees may have more liabilities than assets. The quicker it is evident that someone will not work out and is subsequently replaced, the fewer assets lost by such departures.

This is balanced by the damage caused by "churning" employees. Careful hiring pays dividends.
susan - thank you
2006-05-10 06:05:37
what a great story...even for one who tries to stay away from sports analogies. So many messages in this one.
Colleen O'Connor - #755
2006-05-10 06:18:20
What a great story. To be honest I usually do not read your stories all the way through. I really like the sports analogies. My favorite part was the donoation to Hank's charity.
S - staying in the background
2006-05-10 07:17:09
I do a lot of background work on movies (aka as an "extra") and have seen background actors get fired for talking to the celebrities (aka the "principals"). One time a young man was asked to leave the set when he asked a famous actor to autograph an old record. The famous actor seemed thrilled to do it, but soon after the young man was reprimanded and told he could no longer work on that film. As background actors we have to be very careful not to upset "the talent" - even if it's just looking someone in the eye when they pass us by. It's a sad existence. It's similar to the reaction the groundskeeper's supervisors had, when he asked to meet Aaron. Every time I work on a set, I know I can't make special requests if I want to keep my job. And the entertainment industry is generally a very small world - so what you do gets around. It would be great if we background actors could have a great story like the one of the groundskeeper; maybe one day someone will. For now though, I'd like to keep working, so I just wait for the celebs to talk to me. We're allowed to respond.
Gina - This hits close to home
2006-05-10 07:40:08
Your story brought me hope! I feel that I am working in an environment where I have not reached my full potential or that I get the respect I deserve, because I believe in doing what is right, not was is good for right now. I feel I belong or that fit in with my current place of business but it has promises of bigger challenges that keep me dreaming of the possiblity of success here. So I stay with the hopes of leaving on a high note. Your story made me feel I don't necessarily have to wait to leave on a high note, a better career can be waiting for me where I will fit and suceeed. Thanks for the parable. I love the Wag and the recent survey you sent out. Keep making difference.
Have a wonderful day.
Beth - ball # 755
2006-05-12 04:24:16
Wow! Great story! I love it when we get to see how "all things work together for good." I had several horrible experiences with "bad management" because of the "power trip" thing. I learned that the truth always tells itself eventually. It will truly be a better world when we learn that we all have strengths and weaknesses, employers and employees alike. Our job, while we're here on this crazy little planet, is to learn to treat each other the way we would want to be treated. Too often we lose patience and become unkind. "Power with, not power over" is the only humane way to run a business.
George Brymer - Management miscues
2006-05-13 08:07:18
David: Great post, and a great lesson for managers who falsely profess that "our employees are our greatest assets." I touched on a similar point in the Vital Integrities Blog. Most companies would quickly fire a manager for destroying a $150 computer monitor, but not for mistreating an employee. So, like Aaron's ball, mistreated employees eventually find their way to someone who appreciates them.
Randy - Who owns the ball?
2006-05-13 08:08:09
I think you have it all backwards. What right did the groundskeeper have to keep the ball? Why was he valuable? He seems to be clever and knows how to leverage a situation to benefit himself. How do you translate this to a lesson we teach our children. "Take what you see before someone else"? With your approach we end up with slimmy executives thinking only about themselves.
Jerome - Company should own the ball
2006-05-13 08:09:06
I don't want to defend management here, but I'm kind of in Randy's camp. Arndt wasn't a paying customer who had any right to the ball; he was an employee who was being paid to be there. Take a step back into a corporate context and let's see what happened: One employee did something great, then another employee took the product; the second employee then made demands of the company or he would not return the product to either the first employee or the company. The company fired him. If the millionth iPod came off the assembly line and an employee took it, then demanded to hand it to Steve Jobs or he wouldn't provide it to the company, we'd all see that as absurd. Why is this different?
Harold - Fear of firing
2006-05-13 08:10:18
Hmmm...well David, you've struck a chord with me. I've now decided not to fire anyone for fear they'll take a "valuable asset" from the business. I'm changing my company name to "France". Brilliant post.
Monica Ricci - Bonds failure
2006-05-13 08:11:13
I'm a little torn on the whole "who owns the ball" thing. But I do want to go on record to say that it makes me ill that the very arrogant and (allegedly) cheating Barry Bonds will likely beat the very classy Hank Aaron's HR record. Ugh.
John Gorman - Siding with the groundskeeper
2006-05-13 08:12:05
I don't see how this post relates as described. Here's how I see it: A devoted baseball fan (and really, who WOULDN'T be a fan of Hank Aaron, what a class act...) wanted to personally congratulate Mr. Aaron, by hand delivering to him the cherry on top of a glorious career. Management was unwilling to grant this incredibly miniscule request either by ignorance or selfishness, and then in a cold-hearted b**Ch slap of a move, fired their employee and docked his pay. 25 years later, that same baseball fan turned savvy enterpreneur financed his own retirement off management's ignorance. God bless him! What's the moral of the story? Hang on to items of historical value... they may finance your future. I hope someone burns Barry Bonds' 715th... by the way.
Jerrome - Worker has no rights to compan
2006-05-13 08:12:55
Sorry, John, but he has no right to ask for anything in this case, in my humble opinion. He works there, that's all. He has no rights to the ball or to demand a meeting to turn it over. The Braves could have made this easier by saying yes -- but they had no obligation to do so.
normcpa@comcast.net - Interesting Article
2006-05-23 08:07:02
[Your baseball story is] a great lesson for managers who falsely profess that "our employees are our greatest assets." Most companies would quickly fire a manager for destroying a $150 computer monitor, but not for mistreating an employee. So, like Aaron's ball, mistreated employees eventually find their way to someone who appreciates them.

Write comment
Name:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
Security Image

Powered by JoomlaCommentCopyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.Homepage: http://cavo.co.nr/

 
Web Design by Laryn Bakker