Home
- - - - - - -
About David Batstone
Saving the Corporate Soul
Consulting Services
Speaking Events
- - - - - - -
WAG
Right Reality Blog
Articles
Press
- - - - - - -
Contact David Batstone
Store
- - - - - - -
RSS


Subscribe to the WAG
Email:
Zip:
 

 


I Don't Want to Be Your Friend-ster Print E-mail
Written by David Batstone   

David Batstone Don't be offended. I'd like to be your friend, truly. In some cases, we may even find the opportunity to work on a project together. But please, don't invite me to join your Linked-In network.

I had to stop the other day and ponder why I have so steadfastly refused the latest of umpteen invitations I receive to join an online relationship tree. I suppose I am flattered, on one level, to be a trusted and valued candidate. Ostensibly, no one would want to expose their colleagues and friends to an exploitative operator. So I take each invite as a vote of confidence.

Trust is actually the reason I decline each and every invite. I carefully nurture my own personal and professional networks, of course. Just because I come to trust you as an individual based on experience doesn't mean that I want to leap into your wide world of associations.

A persuasive argument could be made that I would gain access to more professional resources and like-minded people. I can't speak for everyone, but I already feel overwhelmed by the myriad of relationships and opportunities that I am unable to pursue. Just what I need: A barrage of emails from people I don't know, but to whom I'm suddenly linked.

OK, that's a bit over-dramatic because I realize that most networking sites provide the user a way to block unwanted email traffic. The flash promise is that joining is new way to hire or sell using your network. For instance, a good friend of mine received this pitch after joining LinkedIn: "With more than 124,776 people in the management-consulting industry, you can find the candidates you are looking for at LinkedIn."

I asked my friend if the offer was attractive, and her feedback hit the nail on the head: "They fail to make a compelling case for how they are useful. So I can post and search...why would I do it here rather than the 5,000 other places I could do that?"

The answer would come down to actual results, I suppose. Enough people would have to say that they get better results filling job openings and finding the right consultant through these virtual networks than they do through other channels. The jury is still out on that judgment.

But now we are getting to the real heart of my reticence to get linked in. The unnamed motive for joining is that everyone is on the hunt...for something. I rib my university students who join - in big numbers, I might add - MyFace.com. The acceptable explanation they give me for joining: "I just want to meet new people." More like you are looking for romance, I tease back.

I don't assume that everyone who joins an online network is looking for sex. But the unnamed motive is to broaden your pool of relationships for some unmet need or advantage. Again, I don't want to deny anyone that opportunity. It's just the case that I feel awash in networks that emerge from my organically developed, personal relationships.

Hey, I even have some good friends that I haven't used yet.

Comments
Add NewSearchRSS
Riggs Eckelberry - I find the network useful
2005-06-15 11:17:20
I'm one of those people who rarely uses LinkedIn to "get" something, but
instead as part of my policy to refer people usefully wherever I can (when
they ask, of course). I think that's part of what makes the technology world
go around, and LinkedIn has greatly enabled that process.

So I, for one, am grateful for the network.

R
John Morabito - E- Networks
2005-06-15 11:52:18
One of the great things about the onslaught of technology is that it brought real people back in to style.

Much in the way that information drives out knowledge, Linked-In (which I am erolled in - but do not get much out of)
and other services make you long for real human understanding.

My clients become and stay my clients because I truly understand who they are, what they want to do/be/have and how we can get them there - on a personal level.

That does not come from an email - or a customer service center. It comes from one on one interaction - based in trust.

You may meet a lot of people on line - but until you can shake there hand and look them in the eye. You can not build trust.

People are the glue in any transaction and you will not get them around the table with out trust.

So who wants to help me launch www.trust.com?

Konstantin - Good post
2005-06-15 14:29:49
David,

I agree that it does come down to actual results, and as a co-founder of LinkedIn, I can tell you that one fo the more rewarding aspects of working here is the daily stream of thank-you's from people who got a job, business partner or client through LinkedIn. The good news is that LinkedIn works; the bad news is that you need to work LinkedIn. Just signing up and doing nothing else other than accepting connections and occasionally forwarding a contact request is unlikely to give you the results you want.

To get value from LinkedIn, you want to be connected to the right people (not as many as possible)--the kind of people we suggest to connect with are people you've worked with at a company as a co-worker or business partner or a long-time client, for example.

The most common misperception is that LinkedIn is about networking (meeting new people to build your network). What LinkedIn is really good is at managing your existing network or relationships more efficiently.

For example, if you want to get a reference on someone, no more hours of calling around to find someone who used to work with the person you are considering hiring--LinkedIn can tell you in seconds which of your contacts know people who worked with him or her. This works, in fact, even if the candidate is not even on LinkedIn.

And ask recruiters why they love LinkedIn. Or why VC's use it for due diligence. Or how it has helped someone find a great patent lawyer who is recommended by one of their trusted contacts. Or how it has helped job seekers for the first time in their life to find out who of their real-world contacts know people who have an open position.

This stuff is incredibly valuable and is the reason we've grown by word-of-mouth to over 2.9 million users in just a little over two years. I'd invite you to give it a try (not just sign up, but run some searches)--you can always have your account deleted if you don't get the value you are looking for.
Robert Tolmach - LinkedIn
2005-06-17 10:44:57
LinkedIn is different from the other social networks I've seen, e.g., Friendster, etc. LinkedIn is far less burdensome and far more useful than you fear.

I don't receive emails from strangers asking me to be their friend. Now and then, I get a query from someone who found me by searching for particular information. Likewise, if I want to find a friend-of-a-friend at a particular company or with a particular expertise, it makes it easy. It beats emailing or calling everyone I can think of to ask if they have a connection. And introductions from mutual friends get a much better response than cold calling.
community action hero david yo - Netowrking Lab
2005-06-17 11:59:23
I am currently experimenting with LinkedIn to better understand the important questions that you pose in the article. I see value in more interactive tools and I agree that there is no substitute for good quality time directly with humans.

By the way WORTHWHILE and the WAG are the most relevant media forms for the work I do every day. Thanks for sharing your work with us.

SuperVision
Carol L. Skolnick - Why I use online networks
2005-06-18 09:31:59
I am a member of LinkedIn and several other networks. I don't find that I get bombarded with email; neither is my in-box flooded with opportunities. However these networks have been useful in ways I hadn't anticipated. As a consultant, I work in relative isolation. Surfing profiles and interest groups helps me to see who's "out there" and what floats their boats. I also find the folks on these networks to be generous with their insights, which in turn helps me to tailor my services to be more useful.

I also appreciate the opportunity to play "matchmaker" and provide referrals. I get a kick out of that.

Everyone, everywhere is on the hunt. That's okay with me. I don't identify as "prey." Opportunities for meaningful connection abound everywhere, even on the "impersonal" internet.

Warm regards,
Carol

http://hometown.aol.com/sput6
Naina Redhu - Your column is hardly tasteful
2005-06-21 13:32:25
Although I see your point of view, the article takes a swipe at networking in general. The post above does not seem well researched. There needs to be a distinction between ?social? and ?business? networking. It would be quite pointless to compare MyFace.com and LinkedIn.com

I too have written about the futility (sometimes) of traditional networking meetings and trade association get-togethers. But I disagree that LinkedIn does not add value.

I have been a member of LinkedIn and openBC (http://www.openbc.com) for almost a year now. Not only have I created and built relationships with professionals across the world, I have also done business with them and made money and helped connect people who needed each other's services. And I know a few thousand others who have benefited similarly.

We all have our reasons for refusing invitations to connect and members of such business networking portals have learnt to respect that. We have our preferences for different kinds of networking. Some of us prefer the traditional meetings with professionals in their local region, some of us prefer only online business networking and some of us like to combine the synergies of both online and offline business networking - build the foundation of a relationship online and then move on to solidify it with an offline meet.

I personally do not see why I should not accept an invitation to connect from a stranger who makes a decent case - ?Strangers are friends we have yet to meet? - and in today?s ?flat? world (ref: Thomas Friedman), I don?t see why we should not be open-minded enough to explore relationships. As I am involved in the field of Innovation and Consulting, I know that the first principle of Brainstorming to get ?serendipitous? ideas is to have lots of ideas. The quantity is more important than the quality. Quality can be decided once we have the quantity.

Just basing our decisions to connect on our inability to keep-up is hardly professional. And publicly denouncing a portal like LinkedIn for the same reason is hardly tasteful.
Brett Gow - Exclusive and inclusive networ
2005-06-21 13:34:54
It?s everyone?s choice to be inclusive or exclusive. If you think being exclusive makes you more valuable, excellent; but don?t make the mistake of believing it actually makes you better.
Lee - Priceless networks - the ones
2005-06-21 13:35:57
During the first months after I started my own (one man shop) consulting business, I went to quite a few ?networking? events (most of which had some cost of entry). I quickly decided that these events were hideously boring and I met absolutely no one with whom I wanted any sort of relationship - professional or personal. I decided that the only real networks are those forged over time through shared experiences, values or relationships. I feel fortunate to now have a network that I deem priceless.
Shalini Ahluwalia - the right match
2005-07-29 06:48:35
Well i am a software professional based in hyderabad, india and i got my invite from a head hunter who found me through the usual monster.com and forwarded my candidature to the firm he was doing placements for in bangalore. i got the offer but dint take it up due since i thot the relocation package wasnt good enough. then the same guy called me again when he was working on filling positions for another firm, this time one that i had worked for previously :) so we talked and i think we both benefitted from information like whos hiring, which position, profiles they have interviewed so far, the ideal profile and stuff. so when he did send me the invite i instantly accepted. this is like monster + plaxo + small talk with HR ebfore the interview ---- all rolle dinto one. made sense to me.
anon - LinkedIn is the best
2006-06-17 16:08:40
I find LinkedIn INCREDIBLY useful for keeping me connected to alums and other people from my "offline" networks (the databases and other systems that universities set up often fail miserably in this capacity). The beauty of LinkedIn is that connections are made between your TRUSTED friends that might not otherwise have been made.

I definitely agree with you that LinkedIn's use declines if you start making yourself open to connections whom you do not know or who may only be self interested (this is why LinkedIn discourages users from making such connections). I've dabbled with several other networks - and do not find them very useful because they are too "open".

In contrast, I've gotten several EXCELLENT job propositions over LinkedIn only using it passively during the past 2 1/2 years.
Write comment
Name:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
Security Image

Powered by JoomlaCommentCopyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.Homepage: http://cavo.co.nr/

 
Web Design by Laryn Bakker