Home
- - - - - - -
About David Batstone
Saving the Corporate Soul
Consulting Services
Speaking Events
- - - - - - -
WAG
Right Reality Blog
Articles
Press
- - - - - - -
Contact David Batstone
Store
- - - - - - -
RSS


Subscribe to the WAG
Email:
Zip:
 

 


Migrating Non-Profits to Self-Sufficiency Print E-mail
Written by David Batstone   
David Batstone

Social innovators around the world have begun to reach a disquieting conclusion: Inspired vision, impassioned leadership, enthusiastic volunteers, government subsidies and a phalanx of donors are not always enough. But there comes a time when most founders begin to understand that living from year to year does not ensure the future, and that is the moment when they begin migrating from innovation to entrepreneurship. They turn toward commercial markets, gradually exploring the possibilities for earned income, many for the first time, and often with reluctance given their uneasiness about the profit motive.

The above paragraph is essentially how my friend Jerr Boschee starts his new book, "Migrating from Innovation to Entrepreneurship: How Non-Profits Are Moving Toward Sustainability and Self-Sufficiency." Jerr provides an overview of the forces that led to the emergence of social entrepreneurship in the United States. As fascinating as that may be, I found his 14 "critical success factors" for building a successful social enterprise the most significant part of the book.

Jerr's personal history in many ways tracks the development of social entrepreneurship. Perhaps better put, he is both product and pioneer of a social movement.

In 1968 he worked in Northern India as a volunteer with the Peace Corps. He returned to the United States and eventually landed a position working alongside (as personal aide to) Bill Norris, the founder of Controlled Data Corporation. CDC was a pioneering supercomputer firm; for most of the 1960s they built the fastest computers in the world.

Bill Norris also had a passion for building social enterprises. He felt that the Carnegie model of philanthropy - make lots of money then give it away - put limitations on non-profits. Because the non-profit would be dependent on its latest donor, it would lack a certain stability. Beyond that, the non-profit would have a two-track focus - its primary social mission as independent from raising the money to fuel that mission. Wouldn't it be better, Norris reasoned, to integrate the operations more directly into a social mission?

Norris banded CDC together with other major corporations to create what became the National Center for Social Entrepreneurs. Jerr worked there for 16 years, serving as President and CEO for the last nine. Today he wears two hats, as director of an agency offering volunteer opportunities for former Peace Corps volunteers and as director of a think tank, the Institute for Social Enterprise.

In his new book, Jerr shares the lessons he's learned about driving a "double bottom line" - a virtual blend of financial and social returns. He warns that the single greatest obstacle in making this shift is the resistance of the organizational culture. "The cultural transformation can turn into a war," he notes. Hiring people from the for-profit world often becomes the match in the tinder box.

After giving some hints how to soothe the cultural transition, Jerr turns his attention to those factors that are essential ingredients for success. They include attitudes like candor and courage, as well as operational thresholds like building the right team and strategic marketing.

Given my own experience in the social venture world, I latched on to his critical factor #10: "focus, focus, focus." No, that's not a misprint; you can never get enough of focus in building a social enterprise. As Jerr points out, non-profits will be ever tempted to pursue an unrelated business proposition that has the allure of being a cash cow. As long as it supports the social mission, who cares if its off course, right? Wrong...most of these efforts fail because it takes the venture into areas where they have little expertise or network of partners. Jerr's advice is to nail a commercial niche that is directly connected to the social mission of the organization.

In many respects, Jerr's book is a primer for social enterprise. Those already in the game have probably learned many of his lessons the hard way. But even seasoned social venture entrepreneurs may want to use it in their organization as a training manual to make sure that everyone is on the same page.

I love how Jerr closes his book, quoting non-profit executive Robert Harrington: "If you want to help poor people of the world, step one is to make sure you're not one of them."


To order "Migrating from Innovation to Entrepreneurship," write Jerr Bosch (jerr@orbis.net). Significant discounts available for bulk orders.

Comments
Add NewSearchRSS
Anonymous
2006-07-20 06:34:39
Thanks David for your thoughts on NGO’s and the challenges of moving into commercial markets. Also thank for your WAG newsletters which enjoy each week.

I agree that any organisation that wants to have a future needs to find its way commercially at least in part in order to secure its future. I was interested to see that the response to the tsunami brought huge giving in that area but at the detriment to other NGO organisations. Many NGO’s seemed to suffer and the people they help support suffered with them. There did not seem to be an increase in giving over all but rather an increased polarisation of giving to the neediest cause.

There currently seems to be a lot of what I would call ‘positive unrest’ around the issue financing organisations that are set up to help people and communities in developing areas. It is my person belief through experience that there should and indeed does not have to be distinction between an commercial organization that is there to make money for the shareholders and on that is there to work for the benefit of others. I believe that all long term organisations need to be self supporting no matter who they serve. Further more all organisations need to have the people it serves – its customers or consumers and those who serve it – its workers and directors at the heart of its interests. In my view it is a misnomer to say that there should be a separation between organisations that make money and those that do not. All organisations have a duty to be sustainable and to provide sustainable salaries and services.

For a year and a half I have been running a company inspired by my involvement with the Transformational Business Network. A number of us invested in setting up a reconditioned PC sales business in Albania. I by the PC’s from a supplier in the UK and have them shipped over to Albania where they are sold to the public, businesses and schools. This has been successful in so much as two agencies have been set up that provide incomes for two agents and both employ a technician.

However, we have fallen into the trap of attempting a business start up in a country and culture we know little about. It has been a miracle that the project is still running and may soon break even on return on capital invested form sales. The business is a ‘for profit’ highbred. I say highbred because if I charged for my time it would never be profitable. My next venture will be to buy services from an existing business I have DISCOVERED IN Albania that can provide real services that will help develop my OK business.

In conclusion I would say that all businesses and NGO should have similar goals.

• To provide sustainable services from sustainable markets where ever possible.
c.boudreau - understanding non profits
2006-07-20 08:08:16
[EMAIL]claudiab@mcn.org[/EMAIL]
as a life long social worker and having worked or directed many non profits--- I'm thinking Mr. Bosch has a different meaning for the term non profit. Most not for profits need some form of finical help--- because they serve the disinfrancised populations that can not sustain them selves.
Amy Schwab - Social Entrepreneurship
2006-07-20 08:43:32
The fallacy that those served by not-for-profits cannot be better served by a for-profit is, in my experience, a result of a misunderstanding the real meaning of profit. By focusing on the real value that an enterprise is providing to individual constituents and the society as a whole, and focusing on creating a real value exchange of some type, it taps into a deep vein of capabiity that otherwise falls further victim to being helped. By respecting and valuing those being helped, those helped find better ways to value and help themselves. Profit is not 'just' about money - it does, however, find it's physical expression in dollars and sense. Thanks for a great article. I'll be ordering the book pronto!
Monika Matthews - Non-Profit Sustainability
2006-07-20 10:46:05
Kudos to Amy Schwab on her comment. I certainly feel that the causes served by non-profits could just as easily be served by for profit companies, and that in fact may work better. However, a for profit company has to focus on the measure of its success--profit, while a non-profit's measure is much more closely tied to the population served and the good works being performed.

As staff at a small grantmaking family foundation, I strongly urge my board to make grants that will encourage self-sustainability within the non-profit--and that included looking for sources of revenue. A non-profit can and should operate like a for profit in some senses, and in many cases this would keep them from failing to meet the need their mission defines.

Again, thank you for a wonderful thesis. I look forward to reading the book very soon.
Mike Van Horn - Self-sufficient non-profits
2006-07-21 16:48:00
If an organization is self-sufficient, why be a non-profit? The main purpose of having non-profit status is so that people can make tax-deductible contributions to you. If you don't need such contributions, why take on the hassle of non-profit status?

The problem of focus is shared by for-profit and non-profit alike. People form non-profits so their efforts won't be sullied by pursuit of profit, then spend all their time fundraising. The mission of non-profit or for-profit is best served by learning how to operate efficiently and effectively, that is, by applying sound business principles, so that revenue/contributions are used to greatest effect.

The problem with many non-profits I've worked with is that they are oblivious, suspicious--or even contemptuous--of accepted business practices. "Our mission is much too important to be concerned with strong management practices." But their lack of results-orientation detracts from their mission.

Some of my for-profit clients have a complementary non-profit arm, for example, a veterinary hospital with a non-profit arm to care for injured wildlife. I've seen that a successful non-profit operates 80 - 90% like a successful business. Substitute fundraising for marketing, and most other challenges they face are just the same.

Smaller for-profit companies, run by the owner, are often very focused on a mission that is the passion of the owner. Since they are not beholden to outside stockholders, they have a lot more discretion on how they use their profit. Many talk about "giving back" to the community, and making a contribution. It may be why they got into business in the first place. My work with them is to make their operation run as smooth and profitably as possible, so that they generate a surplus to pursue their passion. For example, a woman I work with who owns a general contracting firm has plowed funds into an eco-preserve and bird sanctuary in Belize. Her contracting firm generates the profit; her bird sanctuary generates excitement and satisfaction.

Jason Willett - Nail on the Head
2006-07-22 10:04:07
Another great column, David.
 
This one resonates for me quite loudly as it addresses exactly what we are doing at VolunteerMatch.
 
Since 2000, we've been working with companies committed to corporate social responsibility and employee volunteer programs. The earned revenue we derive from these partnerships - with companies like Charles Schwab, Dell, Ford, MINI, Nationwide, Target, etc. - minimizes our reliance upon philanthropy (currently we're at about 35% financial sustainability) while simultaneously supporting our mission of increasing matches between volunteers and nonprofits.
 
Thanks for the tip on Jerr's book - I'll check it out - and for devoting some as always well-written ink to a particularly favorite topic of mine.
Eric McAndrew - Are the real poor served?
2006-07-22 10:06:20
Your last para. said, "I love how Jerr closes his book, quoting non-profit executive Robert Harrington: "If you want to help poor people of the world, step one is to make sure you're not one of them."

The book addresses a phenomenon being faced by church agencies here in Australia where an economic rationalist government is trying to
corporatise non-profit helping agences by making grants of money with ethically problematic strings attached.

Having several poor people in mind with whom I come into contact in my ministry, I wondered if Robert provided any hints in his book to the poor on how to escape poverty or if his book was only addressed to non-profit agencies.

Write comment
Name:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
Security Image

Powered by JoomlaCommentCopyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.Homepage: http://cavo.co.nr/

 
Web Design by Laryn Bakker