If the links or graphics aren't displayed correctly, click here to view this edition on the web.

Right Reality:
Health Care: Neither You Nor Your Company Can Afford It

David Batstone

by David Batstone

I just received notice from my primary employer, the university, that my personal contribution to cover health care premiums will rise 20 percent per year for the next 3 years. My per medical visit deductible fee also went up 50 percent. I promised that my family would not fall ill anymore, but my plea fell on deaf ears.

If you work for a U.S. company, I am sure you could share your own story of rising medical insurance costs; that is, if your employer still covers you. Employer-sponsored health insurance is becoming scarcer and more costly according to the annual health coverage survey conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research & Educational Trust. Their report shows that premiums for job-based health insurance is rising 9.2 percent on average nationwide in 2005, about three times the general rate of inflation. More worrying, the slice of companies even providing health benefits to employees dropped to 60 percent in 2005, down from 69 percent in 2000.

I don't blame my employer for the bigger bite out of my paycheck, nor should you. The problem resides way beyond your bosses' control. Health care costs have become a major burden on businesses that provide insurance coverage: General Motors now spends about $1,525 on health care for every car it produces - or roughly $6 billion in 2005.

Howard Schultz, the chairman of Starbucks, made the jolting revelation last week that Starbucks will spend more on health insurance for its employees this year than on raw materials needed to brew its coffee. Schultz, whose Seattle-based company offers health care coverage to employees who work at least 20 hours per week, said Starbucks has paid double-digit increases in health insurance costs over the past four years. "It's completely non-sustainable," even for companies like his "that want to do the right thing," Schultz told a gathering of U.S. senators.

Indeed, these costs are so burdensome to US corporations that more and more companies either don't offer health coverage, or coverage is so expensive that few employees can afford to participate in the plan. Clearly the system is broken.

The U.S. Congress rejected attempts to more tightly managed care in the late 1990s. Although a single-payer, universal health care plan works fine and dandy in most European countries, Australia, and Canada, a high-powered medical care lobby in Washington DC fights any attempt to reform the medical care system. So we are stuck with half-baked measures to contain runaway medical costs, and they consistently fail.

As a nation, the U.S. cannot rely solely on private-sector insurance. According to the 30-member-country Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, "the United States spent $5,635 per person on health [in 2003], more than twice the OECD average and around ten times more than the lowest-spending countries, Mexico and Turkey." The United States devotes 15 percent of its gross domestic product to health spending.
Fortunately, American business leaders are engaging lawmakers in a new conversation around health insurance that transcends traditional conservative-liberal labels. For instance, last week, Schultz was joined by Dawn Lepore, president and CEO of Drugstore.com, Costco CEO Jim Sinegal, and Ivan Seidenberg, chariman and CEO of Verizon Communications in sharing concerns about what they identify as a growing health care crisis.

Shultz traces his passion about health care back to his youth in New York City when he saw his dad struggle to hold down a series of low-wage jobs, none of which included health insurance. "I wanted to try and build a company that my father never got a chance to work for," Schultz said.

The fact that skyrocketing health care costs make U.S. employers less competitive in the global marketplace will be the factor that will tip the scale in favor of a dramatic revision of the health care system. One clear sign: more U.S. companies are looking at Canada as a possible site to relocate their operations due to more affordable health care costs up North. Furthermore, as U.S. health costs continue to soar - and believe me, they will - more would-be entrepreneurs are reluctant to quit Corporate America and its blue-chip benefits to start companies. That trend impacts on innovation and job growth, when both are vital to the U.S. economy.

"As a company, we spend more on health care than we do on steel," Bill Ford, chairman and CEO of the Ford Motor Company told the U.S. Chamber of Commerce late last year. Ford followed this shocking admission to business leaders with a call to arms that makes more than sense: "What we seek is a partnership with the government to find solutions to America's health care needs. Our goal should be to make affordable, quality care more accessible to everyone."

Send to a friend

Are you fed up with the U.S. health care system? Speak your mind at the Right Reality blog.

the WAG

September 21, 2005

Headlines:

Sound Byte

"I have a world-famous astrophysicist friend -- he does most of his work thinking. He could be on an airplane, he's looking out the window. Before he goes to his computer, he has everything worked out in his head. If you looked at Mozart, you would have seen a man sitting. He only had to compose 20 minutes a day because he had it all in his head. So you'd say Mozart was a person who worked for 20 minutes. That's a naive view."

-Author Joyce Carol Oates, interviewed in Worthwhile magazine

Subscribe to Worthwhile Magazine

Subscribe to WorthwhileGrab the magazine that can help you find joy throughout the year. Click here for the low $15 rate -- for yourself or as a gift -- through the easy subscription form.

Subscribe now.


Radio: The Right Moment Debuts

Listen to the debut of David Batstone's 1-minute audio commentary, The Right Moment. He features Working Assets, a telephone company with $140 million annual revenue that directs a portion of its revenues to lobby for gun control, to derail policies that hurt the poor, and to promote peaceful alternatives to war, among other causes.


Survey: US Consumers Desire Community; Europeans, Asians, Australians Buy Green

A new survey, by the research firm Global Market Insite, quizzed more than 15,000 online consumers in the U.S. and 16 other countries about their socially conscious business practices.

Americans placed the highest value on corporate community involvement; when asked what factor was the most important in determining if a business is socially responsible, "contributing to the community" (e.g. sponsorship, grants, employee volunteer programs) came in highest with 47%. On the other hand, all of the other countries surveyed (India, Canada, Australia, Germany, China, and Japan) selected environmentally preferable practices (recycling, using biodegradable products) as the top factor.

While only 14 percent of American 18-29 year olds label themselves as socially responsible consumers, half of this age group (50 percent) responded that they will spend more on products branded as organic, environmentally friendly, or fair trade compared to their older and wealthier counterparts - only 37 percent of 45-64 years olds saying they would spend more on green products.

Surprisingly, a large majority of online consumers in the less developed countries of China and India, 91 and 71 percent respectively, will pay more for socially responsible products, while almost half (47 percent) of the U.K. respondents indicated they would spend more for these types of goods.

Read more.


The Tail Wags: Insurance Is Merely a Loan

In response to last week's column, "Geico Makes Promises It Does Not Keep," Joe Carter was one of many WAG readers who weighed in:

You're so right about the devolution of the insurance industry into a commodity scam. Insurance is no longer insurance, it's merely a loan for if you dare make a claim or are unfortunate to have one placed on your policy, your premium will inevitably rise. The insurer wants its money back; it has in essence merely loaned you money for claim payments. I think there's a regulatory shortfall here; state regulators need to take a close look at industry practices that seem aimed at all but eliminating insurer risk.

Read nearly 30 more responses...and add your own...at the Right Reality blog.


Data Point: Where the Jobs Are

Top Ten Employers Adding New Jobs Globally in 2004:

Wal-Mart Stores

100,000 new jobs

J.P. Morgan

67,500

Bank of America

42,200

Aramark

35,000

Citigroup

34,500

Albertson's

29,000

CVS

29,000

United Parcel Service

29,000

Home Depot

25,000

Starbucks

22,700

*Source: Fortune Magazine


Enlightened Leadership: Joseph Nye and The Merits of Soft Power

In general, power is the ability to influence the behavior of others to get the outcomes you want. You can influence others in three ways: by threats of coercion, by payments or inducements, or by attracting and co-opting them. The last of these is "soft" or "attractive" power. When you get others to want what you want, you can economize on the use of inducements ("carrots") and threats ("sticks"). Soft power can sometimes replace hard power, but more often it supplements it. [Soft] power isn't good or bad per se - it's just another form of power, and its value depends on the purposes for which it is employed. At the same time, when you get others to want what you want, it helps you accomplish your goals - with lower costs to both you and them.

...The skillful leader realizes that it is not enough to merely make pronouncements and issue commands. He or she has to get others to buy into the values and goals being articulated. Many leaders realize that it is impossible to run large complex organizations without buy-in [and] attraction....Skillful leaders have always understood that attractiveness stems from credibility and legitimacy.

*Source: Rotman Magazine


Be Inspired

The WAG is produced by rightreality.com

Header image: Photodisc